Validation metrics
Coverage, lead time, correct predictions, false positives, false negatives, and confidence are used to evaluate forecast usefulness.
Documentation
GeoGridIQ treats prediction as a measurable process. Forecasts are evaluated against outcomes so model confidence and limitations remain visible.
Coverage, lead time, correct predictions, false positives, false negatives, and confidence are used to evaluate forecast usefulness.
Machine-learning artifacts should only be used when data quality, feature contracts, and holdout validation support trust.
Rules-based fallback remains available when a model cannot be loaded or does not meet trust requirements.
Explore related workflows
Read the broader forecast accountability page.
See how confidence and risk drivers are presented.
Frequently asked questions
Validation helps separate forward-looking predictions from reactive reporting and exposes where thresholds or data quality need improvement.
Related GeoGridIQ resources
Read GeoGridIQ documentation for platform overview, data sources, prediction engine, GIS engine, weather intelligence, NDVI, and crew optimization.
Public utility intelligence reports covering Quebec outage risk, vegetation threats, storm impact, and critical infrastructure exposure.
Explore how GeoGridIQ combines weather signals, vegetation risk, historical outages, and explainable prediction models to identify areas at higher outage risk.
GeoGridIQ uses NDVI, satellite imagery, vegetation density, and infrastructure context to help identify vegetation pressure near electrical assets.